Boston Globe? Their interrelationship is downright incestuous.

As though anyone really gives a shite about flaming RINO Powell. Every once in a while he pokes his head out from well-deserved oblivion in order to make a bid for relevance. Newsflash, Colin: Nobody cares what you think or whom you endorse.

In addition to his Marxism, his arrogant narcissism is his tragic flaw. His is, at best, a mediocre intellect and even his much vaunted oratorical skills are on the average side. Resonance and intonation do not a great orator make, and all he has going for him in that regard is a street preacher's glibness-- yet even that deserts him when he has to speak extemporaneously. The man is essentially a gray nonentity and everything else about him is camouflage and subterfuge.

As though you would know anything about these characteristics except how to spell them!

Oh, please. If the "undecideds" had any brains, they wouldn't be "undecideds." How can any intelligent person not have made a choice by now? Only the hopelessly apolitical still don't have a clue, and they probably should not be voting anyway.

Remember, these are many of the same brain-dead moral equivalency jerks who decided that Bill Clinton's peccadillos were "only about sex"-- a moral laxity which only applies to democrats. The fact that he also lied under oath is of no importance to them. Again, it's only wrong when Republicans do it. By the same token, their successors will judge Obama, as you say, by the "cool quotient" and by the fact that a pack of Hollywood bimbos, would-be actors, and over-the-hill rock stars are among his ardent supporters.

My heart is with you, Cedar, but my head tells me that far more people walked away from the debate believing that Obama had scored one over Romney. Clarabelle Crowsfeet's next day "sort-of" self-correction was heard by very few (After all, who watches CNN anymore?). The damage had already been done, the moment for correction long passed, and only we conservatives bothered to fact-check what we already knew to be the truth, I believe Jay is correct when he says Mitt missed an opportunity to slam the lie in real time.

You are dead right! What we have to do as loyal conservatives is to gird our loins and sit through an evening's worth of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS and compile a list of the leading sponsors. We should then make this list go viral and see what happens. I stopped patronizing CVS when it caved into Van Jones's blackmail of Glenn Beck and dropped AARP for shamelessly promoting Obamacare. Are these outfits still in business? Sure, but they're not getting my money. Multiply me by thousands-- maybe millions-- of others, and the dissent will have a greater impact. Advertisers are profiteers-- they'll get the message.

In fact, the morons in the audience actually applauded this manufactured "gotcha" moment.

Well, perhaps you CAN take the Africa out of Africa, but in the case of Obama it's a case of his putting on a black accent because he's playing Demagogue and Rabble-Rouser that particular day. You wil notice that the rhythms and inflections of his speech shift from audience to audience, so that one day he's addressing "the people" and the next he's in front of "the folks." Like most gifted charlatans, he knows how to work a crowd, and the fact that so many of them are fatuous enough to get the vapors every time he opens his mouth just makes his work that much easier. One could make the case that working the crowd is the closest he has ever come to actually doing a job. Still. his act is strictly for the rubes.