In response to:
The stamp is an excellent idea! (Although without a doubt there is someone out there who is allergic to the inks, would have a reaction, sue the government etc.)
A recent business trip got me thinking about those on the Left who oppose the movement by States to increase the security of elections by requiring people to produce photo identification (“ID”), generally a driver license or government-issued identification card, although there are other forms of permitted ID, before they can vote. As this is an election year, this issue is back in the news.
On this trip, it seemed that every time I turned around I was having to show people my ID: the TSA agent inspected it before I could get through security at the airport; the man...
Perhaps a locked bracelet made from hypo-allergenic, surgical steel that could be removed at the same, convenient polling place the next day?
Any HONEST person with a genuine and legitimate allergy to the ink would proudly wear the bracelet as a mark of honor and civic duty and think nothing of the trifling inconvenience of having to come back the next day to have it removed.