In response to:

The Need for Semi-Automatic "Assault" Weapons

Robyn51 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 10:11 AM
Damn straight, you idiot. Someone breaks in and threatens anyone I love, I will shoot. I am a damn fine shot and proud owner of a sweet mini-Glock. I would NOT shoot to wound- I WOULD shoot to kill. "Judge, jury and executioner"? You had best believe it. Tell ya what "allison"- put a sign in your yard, announcing your proud support of gun control. Sleep well!

By now, we’ve heard the argument about semi-automatic "assault" rifles: nobody needs one. We’ve heard the only reason why someone would obtain this kind of weapon is so they can kill people, which is far from the truth. We’ve also heard the argument from both the Left and the Right that a pistol is how someone protects their home.

"I really don’t know why people need assault weapons. I’m not a hunter but I understand people who want to hunt," Republican Rep. Peter King said on Morning Joe earlier this week. "I understand people who live in rough neighborhoods...