In response to:

In 2016, GOP Needs a Candidate Voters Believe In

Roberty Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 8:45 AM
Romney stated that we must repeal Obamacare and I thought, "Maybe he is getting it!" Then he followed it up with "replace it...." What the .... is does not matter because it showed that in spite of the rhetoric, he is still a statist. What cost the GOP a "giveaway election?" Their candidate. Want to win an election? Choose a leader that talks and has proven the principles of individual liberty and smaller government and the voters will have a REAL choice. And don't disenfranchise large portions of what should be your base (Tea Party, evangelicals, state electors).
anti-neocon Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 9:07 AM
chameleon romney is a fraud. mr. electable was not even electable. how ridiculous to think that the author of obama-romneycare should be the one to save us from obama-romneycare.
westriversd Wrote: Nov 18, 2012 12:08 PM
Don't you anti-Romney "conservatives" have a clue about what, if you did not go vote for him, you have done to our country? Obama is certainly not better than Romney would have been, yet you aided and abetted the downfall of the USA.

In the wake of Mitt Romney's loss, many Republicans say the GOP must make far-reaching changes to be competitive in future elections. White voters are a smaller and smaller part of the electorate, they point out, while Latinos and other minorities are growing as a percentage of the voting public. Unless the Republican Party reinvents itself to appeal to those voters, the argument goes, the GOP can get used to being out of power.

There's something to that. The electorate is changing, and the Republican Party needs to keep up with the times. But the more fundamental answer to the...