Surprise, surprise, surprise!

I sincerely doubt that Mitt Romney understands this or will act appropriately. This is one of the big reasons I really don't like Romney even though I will probably end up voting for him in November. The lesser of two evils is still evil.

"branded a leading Republican plan "unfair and harmful" and "a form of withholding care." I find this line VERY disturbing. The Federal Government has no business being involved in the healthcare BUSINESS. Period. at all. There is no NEED for the Republicans to counter with their own plan, the only correct plan is to back the Federals out of the way and return the power (and consequences) to the indivdual. Government interference (and frivolous lawsuits) is jacking healthcare prices sky high (I forgot insurance practices) and can NOT make it better by passing more regulations.

She knows the Constitution. I find that rather hard to believe. Nanacy Pelosi can kiss my astroturf.

In reading this article one thing really jumpedout at me; I got the impression that the 1st Circuit Court thinks that government grants rights. Could be my misinterpretation but my rights are granted by God and not government. Next, defining marriage is a state issue I believe but only if a "married" couple crosses into another state and does not fit that state's definition would the Federals even be involved as for as requiring recognition of the union. It would be best if DC stayed out of it. As with most things.

Typical statist reaction to a statist caused problem: Pass another law. If our Federal Government would concern itself with the duties that is supposed to be restricted to by the U. S. Constitution there would be no tax dollars going to PP and this would not be an issue because you could not determine the reasoning behind a woman's decision whether to abort a pregnancy or not. THAT is a true stance for women's rights and for a woman's individual responsibility.

Rickey....You must have the same defective copy of the Constitution that I have!

Romney cake walked with those that voted in the Presidential primary in Texas. Many of those people are resigned to a Romney nomination. I'm with Anne; I do not like or trust Mitt Romney but I will most likely vote for him in November. Remember, voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.

I don't know who Anne will vote for in November but even though Romney will win Texas handily it does not mean that we actually like him much, if any. It would behoove the GOP to take note because their continued pushing of statist (though much less than the Dems) is starting to really turn off us tax paying voters.

Typical statist reaction to a statist caused problem: Pass another law. If our Federal Government would concern itself with the duties that is supposed to be restricted to by the U. S. Constitution there would be no tax dollars going to PP and this would not be an issue because you could not determine the reasoning behind a woman's decision whether to abort a pregnancy or not. THAT is a true stance for women's rights and for a woman's individual responsibility.