Same logic as the Global Warming/Climate Change "science": for a black man = racist; against a black man = racist, warming trend = global warming, cooling trend = global warming.

You got the conclusion wrong: Tea bagger conclusions -- I don't care whose fault it is, Obama's policies are not making things better. Get it? Tea baggers are not in love with GWB. Can you start there with your future posts?

After reading several of your posts, I just don't get your point. I think most all could agree that Bush was a terrible president on domestic issues because he was no conservative and he gave in too much to a liberal Democratic congress in his last two years (actually even before; witness the Medicare drug program). So, some of the stats under GWB are worse than some of the stats under Obama. What's your point? You want to stay with a looser just because he is not as bad a looser as the last looser? Bad policies are bad policies no matter whether Republican or Democratic. What do you have to say about the policies of the Obama redistributionists? Is there no better alternative?

Oh we are beyond that old saw. Now it's the TEA folks' fault! And, a little bit the tsunama in Japan, the melt down in Greece, the Irish situation, etc., etc. .......

Anything negative about Obama: it's all W's and Tea's fault. Anything negative about GWB: never mention that for two years he was dealing with a tax & spend Democrat-controlled congress.

It's all a smoke screen. He's just "wagging the dog" like Clinton did. Clinton took public attention off of the impeachment; Obama is taking the attention from the budget crisis.

programmed into my system to receive automatic
"Flag as Offensive" responses.

This is about the most appropriate reply that I can come up with.

Such blind obedience to socialism that any issue will receive the liberal slant by any stretch of the facts, often to the breaking point, is certainly offensive.

First, Sir, I'm simply amazed that someone with your level of rationality and logic hales from CA! Bravo. Now do me a favor regarding your statement:

"Geologists are still arguing about the causes of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, a genuine period of global warming, but one thing we do know about it for certain is that dissolved greenhouse gases are a lagging indicator."

Please tell LMFAO Hal what types of fuels the electricity generating industry was using and just what types of SUVs were on the market during the Paleocene-Eocene period. You may also wish to elaborate on what "lagging indicator" means in a statistical analysis. It would help also to explain the difference between correlation and...

GODLESS

Especially for Hal (aka LOL or LAMO or Lame Brain)

I've never seen the Christian message so twisted before! I don't find where Christ even suggested that the government take one person's property (money) and buy someone else something (health care).