1 - 10 Next
In response to:

5 Reasons Not To Bomb Syria

ROBERT3033 Wrote: Sep 03, 2013 11:42 AM
This administration has spent more time "walking back", offering additional comments, adding further explanation, claiming contextual errors, creating false scenarios, blaming Bush, telling other lies, using misdirection, blaming republicans employing smoke and mirrors, displaying slight of hand and deploying a complicit media than a joint international convention of magicians and political biographers.
In response to:

Unintended Consequences

ROBERT3033 Wrote: Sep 03, 2013 11:20 AM
Two things these liberal/progressives want are (1) votes (they allow people even constituencies to be hurt socially, economically, and intellectually to get these votes). (2) to protect their children from having to rub elbows with the people they claim to be helping...the poor of all colors.
Underwater CPR doesn't work. NEITHER DOES IMMIGRATION REFORM WITHOUT FIRST SECURING THE BOARDER! The problem with the former just keeps getting worse until the patient turns blue then dies of suffocation, or with the latter, the country turns blue and dies from self-strangulation.
As closely as BHO was communicating with IRS, it is obvious he knew what they were up to. Also, since Eric Holder is his best pal, BHO knew what DOJ was doing. Mark my words. It will all surface,
No immigration, including legal immigration for Muslims. Also, no travel to the USA for these high risk groups of potential terrorists. Have them remain in their home countries to stop radical Islam there rather than transporting it here as they have across Europe. Allow only the highly educated from any country to immigrate to the USA so they can help us solve our National problems rather than add to them. These are common sense suggestions for the good of our country. They are not extreme suggestions as the PC, rose colored lens wearers and their cynical leaders would call them. Vote for the conservative..
In response to:

The “NEED” For Immigration Reform

ROBERT3033 Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 6:17 PM
That's the point. Walls and fences and 10,000 more INS agents and even the cooperation of the Democrats who are against fixing the problem for political reasons won't stop the flow. We have to have Mexico working the boarder too. There has to be some benefit we can withhold in addition to legal immigration to make it happen.
In response to:

The “NEED” For Immigration Reform

ROBERT3033 Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 6:16 PM
That's the point. Walls and fences and 10,000 more INS agents and even the cooperation of the Democrats who are against fixing the problem for political reasons won't stop the flow. We have to have Mexico working the boarder too. There has to be some benefit we can withhold in addition to legal immigration to make it happen.
In response to:

The “NEED” For Immigration Reform

ROBERT3033 Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 1:12 PM
No immigration, including legal immigration for Mexicans until the Mexican government becomes a serious partner in stopping rather than supporting the flow. I would start with a ten year moratorium, to be either extended or shortened based on the adequacy of the response of the Mexican government. Return all non citizens to their home countries unless they are productive and not dependent on the state for benefits. No immigration, including legal immigration for Muslims. Have them remain in their home countries to stop radical Islam there rather than transporting it here as they have across Europe. Allow only the highly educated to immigrate to the USA so they can help us solve our National problems rather than add to them. Speed up the pro
In response to:

Connecting the Dots on Healthcare

ROBERT3033 Wrote: Mar 12, 2013 10:23 AM
More patients will wait in lower lines for more expensive care with fewer services and treatments, for more money, delivered by fewer doctors who will be paid less for their time and efforts. The elderly and others with chronic and acute illnesses requiring sustained and heroic treatments will be turned away as Medicaid and Medicare are robbed out of existence to pay for and preserve the BHO, ACA legacy. What could possibly go wrong?
In response to:

Yesterday's LollaPaulooza

ROBERT3033 Wrote: Mar 08, 2013 11:00 AM
(continued from previous post) Anytime this administration is pushed to talk policy, you can count on its not being specific or willing to set limits on themselves-regardless of Constitutional prohibitions. Someone finally had the courage to pin them down with a sustained effort to highlight the administration's evil efforts to transform our Country and potentially, hold dissenters in check...even assassinate them for whatever reason they chose to warp into their definition of "Imminent threat." That was a good thing Senator Paul did my fellow patriots. Good on you Rand! Shame on you two bubble-headed Rhinos John Mc and Lindsey G.!
1 - 10 Next