In response to:

Actually, U.S. Military Still Uses Lots of Horses and Bayonets

Robert217 Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 1:35 PM
How relevant is a comment about horses in a conversation about the Navy? Does this idiot have such low regard for the military that he doesn't understand the difference between the Navy and the Army or that ships and horses aren't interchangeable? Can you imagine the hoots and howls if George Bush had made the horse comment when discussing the Navy? Sounds like Obama has the "silver foot in his mouth" now. Obama's amazing grasp of military readiness and preparedness was on full display in Benghazi, how did that work out?
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 2:11 PM
He went to bed and put the 3 a.m. call on voice mail.
Jack2894 Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 1:41 PM
Conservatives are indeed the last remnant of neanderthal thinking on earth. Obama speaks. You are too stupid to understand. But you think the fault is his.
Rodney47 Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 1:54 PM
If you tie a string to your food before you eat it, you can pull it back up and eat it again. Who needs food stamps. Spread the word.
Evoxx Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 2:08 PM
Obama: "...the nation...ME..."

Seems pretty easy to understand...arrogance.

Last night during the final presidential debate of 2012, President Obama said we have "fewer horses and bayonets" during an exchange with Governor Mitt Romney. The comments were condescending, belittling and Obama implied the use of bayonets and horses was obsolete. This is not the case. Yes, Obama said "fewer" rather than "not at all," but let's take a look at how the military uses horses and bayonets today.

First, the Marines. The Marines have an entire page on their website dedicated to the bayonet, which is used in...