In response to:

Marriage: A Supreme Test of Rights

Robert1824 Wrote: Mar 04, 2013 10:50 PM
Beethoven's 10th, you're dead wrong. My condemnation of Jackosn's homophobia has absolutley nothing to do with the fact that he's black . I condemn homophobic bigotry no matter who is guilty of it . Phony argument . But that's alll you can expect from right-wing extremist doofuses like you . I'm bashing Jackson not because he is black, but because he is an appallingly narrow-minded, intolerant and self-righteous jerk. This kind of person can be found among people of all races .
Younger Wrote: Mar 05, 2013 12:11 PM
Robert, how does Bishop Jackson show fear of homosexual people? You are bigoted in your characterization of those who point out the immortality and unnaturalness of homsexual activity as being afraid of homosexual activity.

From the very beginning, homosexual “marriage” activists have sought to hijack not only the moral authority of the Civil Rights Movement, but also the legal arguments which liberated minorities from centuries of legalized oppression and discrimination.

After decades of aggressive activism, the common sense understanding of marriage has become almost hopelessly mired in incomprehensible legal terminology. It becomes difficult for everyday observers to navigate the convoluted logic homosexual activists employ as they attempt to remake one of civilization’s oldest institutions. The argument that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples is only “fair” rests on a specious interpretation of the equal protection...