Question...with all the recent talk about what people, "need," wouldn't any rational thinking American agree that these singing and/or acting celebrities don't, "need," all the money they have? So why don't they all donate all their money, except for what they need, to the fed govt.? After all if taxes can fix things, shouldn't the tax rate be 100%. Not sure what they are waiting for. I'm sure the feds will take more than the legal tax amount from all of these folks. And then spend it on worthy social causes that will pick everyone up (tongue firmly in cheek).

Don't ever confuse logic and a liberal viewpoint. They are never one and the same. The argument above ("Abortion, they argue, is like any product or service that consumers want and government prohibits or overregulates. If they can’t get what they want legally, they will get it illegally.") 100% negates the arguments made for gun control laws (AKA gun bans). BTW, why is it okay to be pro-choice for abortion, but not okay to be pro-choice for gun ownership, health care coverage, what we eat and drink, the products we choose and businesses we choose to patronize, religion, etc.? I'm still waiting for a lib to answer this...Anyone...

Exactly! But don't ever confuse logic and a liberal viewpoint. They are never one and the same. The argument above 100% negates the arguments made for gun control laws (AKA gun bans). BTW, why is it okay to be pro-choice for abortion, but not okay to be pro-choice for gun ownership, health care coverage, what we eat and drink, the products we choose and businesses we choose to patronize, religion, etc.? I'm still waiting for a lib to answer this...Anyone...

In other words, they are pro-choice as long as the choice is abortion. What kind of a sycophant would encourage abortion and discourage life? And if you are pro-choice, doesn't that mean you support CHOICES? More unexplainable hypocrisy from the left.

I am pro-choice. Pro-choice on whether or not to own a gun (or guns), pro choice on choosing my healthcare plan (or not), pro-choice on what lightbulbs I use, what I choose to do with my money and what I choose to eat and drink. The hypocrisy of pro-choice for abortion and anti-choice on so many other things is not lost on me. The elitists believe they know best for all, so they cram their ideas down everyone's throats. A healthy citizenship will never allow this bs. Or are we too late?

This just supports the idiocy of the left. Their intentions and actions are almost always in conflict; or at best, coincidental. They want to increase revenue so they raise taxes, even though it has been statistically proven ad nauseum that hikes equate to reduced revenues, tax reductions equate to increased revenues. Economic principles be damned when it comes to the ideology of the libs. I have asked any and every lib I have ever come across to answer one question with proof, to no avail. Name one government program that has accomplished what it was set out to do? Here is another question, name one government program that is more effective than free market principles?

She cannot go after the dean for disorderly conduct. But, and I am not a litigious type, she certainly can go after the dean, the police and the University with a civil suit claiming real harm and injury. In this case, I'd recommend that to her and her parents post haste.

This is far and away the most horrific news development I have followed through Townhall. The continuing degradation of our societal morals and values will lead to our complete and final undoing. Save your global warming. Terrorism, in all its forms (including these sadist abortion doctors) is the real threat to mankind. What kind of complete hypocritical brain-dead idiot argues that we should have more gun control laws, as if that will end maniacs shooting up schools, while continuing to believe in and support the ongoing murder of millions of unborn (and sometimes born) children? Libs have no soul.

Robert, I asked you some questions below and provided some cogent thoughts. Reply?

Sorry, how true.

How so?