1 - 10 Next
Once again, I'm reminded of the epitome of hypocrisy that exists on so many liberals' car bumpers..."co-exist."
In response to:

Obama's State of Disunion

Rob Constitution Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 3:49 PM
Listening to Obama say anything is like fishing in the middle of a cornfield. Each produces no result.
In response to:

Michael Moore, Michigan Sniper

Rob Constitution Wrote: Jan 21, 2015 2:45 PM
What would your plan be to fight against terrorists, tyranny and the rest of those who mean us direct harm? In your warped world, Kyle isn't a hero but someone who deserves to die for defending our country and way of life? I polite ask you to leave my country, Pinko and go live with folks with whom you are like-minded, like apparently Iraq.
So caring about other people allows for pedophilia, incest, etc. Are you suggesting these are moral? FYI, you can shun God and natural law all you want. It doesn't change that God and natural law DO provide us with universal, absolute and eternal moral codes. Pedophilia, incest, etc. do not fit in this moral code, no matter how much of a moral tantrum you throw or how much you believe in relativism!
In response to:

Sneering at the Sniper Movie

Rob Constitution Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 3:00 PM
How 'bout A.O. Scott?
True, the amendments came from the states' appeals for further power/protection.
The truth shall set you free. No man-made transient and malleable law can circumvent or supersede God’s natural laws. Therefore, fear not what man-made folly may be thrust upon you in the course of defending your oneness with God’s will. Stand against religious persecution and intolerance. Our country was forged on the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Our founding fathers sought guidance from scripture and philosophers such as Cicero and Montesquieu. To wit… James 1:25 But the one who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer who forgets but a doer who acts, he will be blessed in his doing. Legitimate government protects liberty and justice according to "natural law.” -Cicero There are general causes, moral and physical, which act in every society, elevating it, maintaining it, or hurling it to the ground. -Montesquieu Man can embrace homosexuality. It doesn’t make it right. Man can neither embrace any other doctrine or tenet in conflict with natural law; that too shall not be right.
Don’t confuse the meaning of the words fair and equal. And man-made laws providing preferential treatment in conflict with natural law are not fair or equal. Marital law provides for the marriage of one man and one woman. When you expand that to include homosexuality, you are actually extending preferential treatment to homosexuals. Here is the definition of fair. “marked by impartiality and honesty.” Here is the definition of equal. “like in quality, nature, or status.” Or “like for each member of a group, class, or society.” There is no argument supporting homosexuality that isn’t in conflict with natural law. Therefore, making man-made laws inclusive of homosexual marriage is in conflict with natural law, and in conflict with fair and equal application of man-made law.
In response to:

De Blasio vs. The NYPD

Rob Constitution Wrote: Dec 24, 2014 11:31 AM
...also took shots at the media for “dividing” the city for only reporting about the bad folks, whom he says does not represent the majority of the protestors... Hey, Bill, isn't that exactly what protestors are doing; protesting a very small percentage of the "bad cops" who do not represent the majority of the cops who do their job well with great intentions? Bill, you complete tone-deaf, hypocritical boob! If you are going to call out the media, the media of all folks, for reporting on something that doesn't support your irretrievably stupid agenda, your verbiage is so aptly applied to the protestors who are advancing an irretrievably stupid agenda. And one that is criminally dangerous. Last time I checked, free speech doesn't include that which incites riots and violence. That is what you and the protestors have been doing ceaselessly. Why don't you spend your time uniting instead of inciting?!
I'd like to hear someone ask her on record to explain how she can tell this story in two totally different frames of reference. Did it please you or was it racist? You can't have it both ways. Of course our media and liberals have been allowing her and her husband to have most everything any way they want it for years now. I have zero respect for either of them, based on the content of their character!
1 - 10 Next