In response to:

Feinstein Assault Weapons Ban Covers Rifles, Pistols and Shotguns

rmoody Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 1:45 PM
The founders never mentioned hunting in any of their writings. I don't think they could imagine a time when such a basic right would even be questioned. The writings of our founders left no room for doubt that the 2nd was meant for tyrants.
jthompson108 Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 9:23 PM
Right, that's my point-- hunting with firearms was assumed to be an obvious right that did not need to be codified as law in a written Constitution in order to be recognized. Which is why Justice Scalia & the Supreme Court deemed the main purpose of the Second Amendment-preserving the militia- to be a form of 'argumentum a fortiori'- arguing from the stronger reason. In other words, if it was lawful that the citizens should 'keep and bear arms' for such an important reason as defense against a tyrannical government (the stronger reason), then it was obviously also lawful that these citizens should 'keep and bear arms' for such basic reasons as hunting (a lesser reason). Therefore, the 2nd Amendment inherently protects the rights of hunters.

The New Year is just around the corner and although the Senate still hasn't made a fiscal cliff deal, Senator Diane Feinstein already has parts of new gun control legislation ready to go. Two Sunday's ago on NBC's Meet the Press, Feinstein talked about giving President Obama a bill he can "lead on" and used the term assault weapon loosely.

Feinstein has posted a summary of what the legislation will cover, which inculdes a ban on semi-automatic handguns and shotguns in addition to rifles. The legislation also requires registration...

Saturday, May 25 | 06:10 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 06:10 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 06:10 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 06:10 PM ET