In response to:

How the New York Times Covers Evil

rmccarthy Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:11 AM
If they would recognize that we are ALL sinners, then they might more properly report the facts.
Cymbaline Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 1:52 AM
What does that have to do with the way the New York Times is reporting the conflict? Do you think they're all the same?
Grace103 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 2:16 AM
Apparently, rmccarthy believes that because we are all sinners, when someone attacks us with the intent to kill based on little more than our ethnicity, we are supposed to simply accept it as justice and bare our necks to the blade...
pastorial Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 9:15 AM
G, he believes in turning the other cheek as Jesus said to do.

obviously you don't believe Jesus!
rmccarthy Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 11:08 AM
No, actually, the point is that the Times considers only one side sinners - the Jews.
rmccarthy Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 11:09 AM
You've got to start with the correct premise before you can understand the correct response - Jesus is still being misunderstood.
rmccarthy Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 11:26 AM
Maybe the obstacle here is that I would rely on THE FACTS to show that Israel might be less evil than they are being portrayed by the Times?
pastorial Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 12:37 PM

The way in which the New York Times reports good vs. evil is one of the most important stories of our time.

Take the war between Israel and Hamas that is taking place right now.

This war is as morally clear as wars get. Hamas is a terrorist organization dedicated to annihilating the Jewish state. It runs a theocratic totalitarian state in Gaza, with no individual liberty and no freedom of speech or press. In a nutshell, Hamas is a violent, fascist organization.

Israel, meanwhile, is one the world's most humane states, not to mention a democracy that...

Sunday, May 19 | 01:32 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 01:32 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 01:32 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 01:32 AM ET