In response to:

Obama Awakes—But Can’t Stop Mitt

rman859 Wrote: Oct 18, 2012 9:53 AM
On September 20 — eight days after Obama claims to have called the Benghazi attack an “act of terror” — Jay Carney affirmed to reporters that the White House had never called it “a terrorist attack.” UN ambassador says it was the killer video on 5 talk shows, 5 DAYS LATER. Oboner, blames the VIDEO at the UN 2 weeks later. Either HE Lied at the debate, or Tried to cover up the Terror attack for 2 WEEKS. LIAR or INEPT. The only options. I think its obvious he LIED
This column appeared originally in THE DAILY BEAST.

Forget about Barack Obama’s eagerly awaited emergence from his first debate coma: the biggest question about the second candidate confrontation centered on whether Mitt managed to maintain his undeniable momentum.

After all, a flurry of pre-debate polls showed Romney as the newly minted frontrunner—especially a Gallup survey that gave him a commanding 50-46 percent lead among likely voters in all twelve swing states, including such purportedly impregnable Democratic bastions as Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and (surprise!) New Mexico.

Did the Mittster do anything to disrupt or accelerate his apparent progress toward...