In response to:

4 Reasons The GOP Would Be Foolish To Dump Social Issues

rman859 Wrote: Nov 24, 2012 1:53 PM
George Stephanopolis started the war on women. Knew the Leftist electorate was ignorant and would buy it.
Carl469 Wrote: Nov 24, 2012 4:45 PM
There is no "war on women" by either party. Each practically did somersaults trying to impress and woo the female vote. Use your head.
bagsrao Wrote: Nov 24, 2012 3:36 PM
I guess it had nothing to do with Rebagligoon men redifining what rape is.
AK Mark Wrote: Nov 24, 2012 5:54 PM
Party line talking points. Both Akin and Mourdock were clumsy, Akin was wrong about biology, but their comments have been misconstrued.
AK Mark Wrote: Nov 24, 2012 5:55 PM
And I suspect you know it.

Win, lose or draw, we're always supposedly hitting a tipping point where social issues just no longer work for the Republican Party. At first glance, this would appear to be a rather puzzling sentiment. After all, in 2010, despite the fact that the GOP was just as socially conservative as we were this year, the Republican Party had its best year in half a century. Furthermore, in 2008 and 2012, the GOP lost despite running moderate candidates who were soft on social issues and who barely brought them up at all. If anything, you'd think that seeing two non-social conservatives...