In response to:

The July 4th Question: 236 Years After The First Revolution Is It Time For A Second?

RLB-In-Texas Wrote: Jul 05, 2012 8:35 PM
Your individual sabre rattling is useless. Succession is the only way to foment another American revolution.
kbright Wrote: Jul 07, 2012 12:28 PM
Are you sure? Because if that is true, then why have you not been calling for the arrest(s) of YOUR state representatives you voted to represent YOU. The oaths they take are MORE then political words. It is a solemn Oath, a REQUIREMENT to get into and to be allowed to stay in that position. It is legal and binding.
The first law statute of the United States of America, enacted in the first session of the First Congress on 1 June 1789, was Statute 1, Chapter 1: an act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths, which established the oath required by civil and military officials to support the Constitution. (continued)
kbright Wrote: Jul 07, 2012 12:29 PM
The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 10: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”
(continued)
kbright Wrote: Jul 07, 2012 12:31 PM
The requirement for all Federal and State Civil officers to give their solemn and binding Oath is established in Article VI, Section 1, Clause 4: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
(continued)

kbright Wrote: Jul 07, 2012 12:32 PM
The three branches of our government, the military, all law enforcement, the heads of the States, all federal employees are required to take an Oath to support and defend the Constitution and not an individual leader, ruler, office, or entity.
Once given, the Oath is binding for life, unless renounced, refused, and abjured. It does not cease upon the occasions of leaving office or of discharge.
(continued)
kbright Wrote: Jul 07, 2012 12:33 PM
They are BOUND by their Oath to support the Constitution, and should they abrogate their Oath by their acts or inaction, are subject to charges of impeachment and censure.

Bound – “Being under legal or moral obligation"
kbright Wrote: Jul 07, 2012 12:35 PM
Solemn: “Legally binding, Common legal phrase indicating that an agreement has been consciously made, and certain actions are now either required or prohibited”, “The other requirement for an agreement or contract to be considered legally binding is consideration - both parties must knowingly understand what they are agreeing to”.

This makes it a civil crime to break the Oath required of them. It also means that anyone in any positions is REQUIRED to keep that Oath to stay in that office or position so can be and should be removed in handcuffs and held for prosecution.

Take back your state so we can save our nation. Arrest the State Oathbreakers and domestic enemies.
kbright Wrote: Jul 07, 2012 12:37 PM
"Domestic enemies pursue legislation, programs against the powers of the US Constitution. They work on destroying and weakening the Rights of the People guaranteed by the Constitution. Plus they create laws, amendments, etc that goes against the restraint on the three branches of our government by the Constitution. They are those who support them in action, or by inaction; vote, voice, money, etc who are going against or trying to weaken the US Constitution and the Peoples written guarantee of the protection of those Rights.

Succeeding will do no good if the enemy is still in positions of power will it?

Let’s start with a shocking, but true premise: If you are a patriotic American, you believe that there are circumstances under which it is right to take up arms against your own government. That statement feels wrong to me. It reeks of militia and McVeigh and toothless loons holed up with guns in cabins in order to avoid paying income taxes.

But the fact remains that the rationale for the existence of the nation known as the United States of America, which first appeared in print 236 years ago today, is entirely dependent on the premise...

Related Tags: July 4th