In response to:

Nine Justices or Fifty States? Who Should Decide Gay Marriage?

RJBJr Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 8:20 AM
I love my nephew. I love some guys I went to college with. I love my brothers. Its not about love. The only difference between me and a homosexual is they like to have anal sex with other guys. So, they are asking the court to find a constitutional "right" to special financial rewards for their aberrant sexual behavior. And people are buying this?
Robert2086 Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 10:26 AM
I am not buying it. I see no reason why single Americans like me should have to pay higher taxes than homosexuals just because we do not participate in their sin.
RJBJr Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 12:36 PM
Exactly the point, Robert!
Thomas2124 Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 8:49 AM
Wow, the trash that comes on this site never ceases to amaze me, nor the refuse that they leave.

And will someone please explain the heterosexual fixation with all things anal? It creeps me out.
NewJAl Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 8:57 AM
The act was brought into the discussion by one who seems to be a flaming Liberal.
And the fixation is singularly strong among the gays.
3204 Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 9:40 AM
If we are going to start projecting the wishes of children onto our evaluations of various laws, divorce will become illegal immediately. And I would presume that there are over a million unborn babies who would prefer not to be ripped from the womb each year. I presume Justice Kennedy’s ears are not cocked as attentively in their direction.

Carlos7 Wrote: Mar 29, 2013 8:24 AM
It's already bought. Most Americans are unable to process critical thought (i.e., think ahead).

I would like to think that Supreme Court justices are smarter than I am.

At one level, they surely are. Their years of devotion to the practice and analysis of law involves countless pages of book-learning I will never undertake. Their brains must fairly bulge with minutiae I cannot grasp.

But there is a difference between intelligence and wisdom. There are high school dropouts who have deep wells of astuteness about how to think, act and live in an enlightened way. And there are Ph.D.’s I would not let into my house.

In one stunning moment Tuesday from the Supreme Court...