In response to:

Churches: Time to Fight!

RJBJr Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 8:34 AM
So let's see. The question is: "is there a right in the constitution to financially reward two gay guys who like anal sex with each other. I can't wait to see what the court decides!
Tommy_Maq Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 1:36 PM
"So let's see. The question is: "is there a right in the constitution to financially reward two gay guys who like anal sex with each other"

No, that isn't the _honest_ disagreement, as even a cursory perusal of this comment thread proves absolutely to anyone with a working brain. Are you kind of stupid about all questions, or just the ones where the facts, history and common morality contradict your feelings?

Would you like to try again to present an _honest_ response to the rational point, or did you fail to learn about the Christian virtues, too?
Texas Chris Wrote: Mar 28, 2013 9:32 AM
When the court upheld Obamacare, they said "elections have consequences".

I'm betting they toss out Prop 8 as well as DOMA, even though "elections have consequences"...

You can’t win the fight if you don’t put on the gloves.

A punch-drunk, old heavyweight boxer knows that’s a truism, but not the churches of America.

The Supreme Court heard arguments this week on the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in the state by a 52 to 47 margin in 2008 but has since been declared unconstitutional by federal courts.

Fox TV, Rush Limbaugh and other talk-show pundits have weighed in, arguing the conservative -- and moral -- position that sanctifying gay marriage with the grace of the U.S. Constitution is not...