That is just plain silly, as there is no comparison between AIPAC on the one hand and CAIR or the Muslim Brotherhood on the other. There is a huge difference between openly lobbying the government as a declared lobbying organization as AIPAC does versus placing agents provocatuer INSIDE the government while deceitfully misrepresenting the interrelationships and connections, goals, beliefs, and objectives of the organization and it's adherents as the Muslim Brotherhood does.
Movie theaters across America have recently called to mind former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a woman whose visionary leadership and fortitude – particularly in the fight against Soviet Communism – earned her the sobriquet “the Iron Lady.”
Lady Thatcher’s partner in dispatching that toxic ideology to the “ash-heap of history,” Ronald Reagan, famously declared in 1961 – at a time when the USSR was still very much a going concern – that “freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” Today, it is threatened by another totalitarian ideology that some have aptly described as “communism with a...
I leave it to your kind to start with the name calling. If you have some point here go a head and make it.
No, it's not silly. Both are trying to manipulate the govt. for selfish and destructive interests. Also, you are forgetting about Rosen and Weissman, two former officials of (A)IPAC who were caught by the FBI accepting classified information from a person involved studying Iran and US options. (A)IPAC should be made to register as a lobbyist for Israel at a minimum and if CAIR is doing the stuff they are accuse of should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I have no use for either.