In response to:

G.W. was MIA

rightsworstnightmare Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 6:08 PM

W was great. Too bad that don't have room on Rushmore for him. Perhaps if we gather the 4000 or so gravestones of our fallen soldiers in Iraq for his debacle concerning WMD's that didn't exist, maybe we could build his monument.

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Original Saepe__Expertus Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 7:58 PM

WORST NIGHTMARE...you neglected to mention JFK, LBJ and Robert McNamara...58,000 KIA in Viet Nam. Proud of your beloved Dems NOW?

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Brent150 Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 7:44 PM

For me, and our international coalition, it was always more about the cease-fire that Saddam Hussein refused to cooperate with, his repeatedly breaking 17 U.N. sanctions, and his saber-rattling that he was pursuing WMD's that forced to U.S. to call off the cease fire on our part, and finally respnd to all his offenses. The world is better without him. Whether or not really, really dangerous weapons were found was kind of irrelevant in the long run. he had shown he was willing to lauch scud missles or invade neighbors in the 90's. We only let him live because he agreed to certain terms with the world after Desert Storm. He broke all of those terms.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All

Bigdogoffthechain Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 7:38 PM

whizz off. bill clinton was convinced that saddam was so dangerous that he signed a bill authorizing regime change in Iraq. More to the point, we founs all the WMD in Iraq, even if you're too stooooopid to know that.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

soliton2 Wrote: Nov 15, 2012 7:27 PM

Yeah, he could go right next to JFK and the 60000 gravestones could be used to build that monument.

You sure you want to get into that calculus, moron?

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment