In response to:

Phoenix Uprising

rickmcq Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 7:41 AM
I cannot understand the Liberal definition of "Diversity." While we are each entitled to our opinions about public policy, only one side generally gets the policy it wishes at any given time. How in the world is it "Inclusive" to drive the opposing side out of the debate? This seems more like a case of "The Ends justifies the use of ANY Means" than it does a case of "Diversity."
gwharpo Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 9:05 AM
You cannot understand it because it's a lie.
rickmcq Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 9:12 AM
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 8:42 AM
"Diversity," like "tolerance," is just another word that Libs use to mean what they want it to mean, not what it really means.
Marie150 Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 9:01 AM
And when are we going to find out what their definition is?
Curtis108 Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 9:22 AM
Never. If they define it, it loses its usefulness to their cause. The entire edifice is built of ill-edfined or undefined words.
evie10 Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 12:55 PM

Elon University has now ceased to be a serious institution of higher learning. In fact, it no longer deserves to be called a university in the wake of its decision to create a new Vendor Policy Study Committee. The committee, which was created by Elon's Board of Trustees in October, is part of a response to efforts to ban Chick-fil-A from the Elon campus. Its very existence shows that Elon cannot expeditiously handle simple issues concerning tolerance and inclusion. Instead, it legitimates bigotry by giving serious consideration to anti-religious zealots who would best be ignored.

Elon's 15-member committee is made up...