Previous 11 - 20 Next
They are not trying to win you over, DDD, they are just being entertained by your responses when they push your buttons. They know that you are not smart enough to figure that out.
I disagree. It has no thinking capacity, it FEELS.
We call them like we see them and a gun hater is a gun hater. By the way, that's a mental condition called hoplophobis - you should see a doctor about it. Or, if you're already seeing one ask him to double your medication dosage.
Once we recognise the problem the solution should be simple. First, marriage is two different things simutaneously. It is a religeous sacrament AND a legal contract. Note that it can be either one or both but usually is both. Marriage was not a legal contract until circa 1756 when Britain passed a law to ensure that a wife got half of the union's assets when divorced. As a religeous sacrament it goes back thousands of years. The solution to the "marriage" problem is simple. Just remove all references to "marriage", "married", and their synonyms from all laws, regulations, and other documets produced by all levels of government and replace them with something like "DP", defined by law to mean Domestic Partnership. (more in reply to this)
In response to:

Carbon Tax Fight Looms

RickeyB Wrote: Mar 16, 2013 12:18 PM
I had to continue here, too many words. Two German Physicists have proven that the greenhouse effect on global temperatures is impossible.. The mechanism upon which the global warming conjecture is base is a perpetual motion machine. This proof was published several years ago.
In response to:

Carbon Tax Fight Looms

RickeyB Wrote: Mar 16, 2013 12:14 PM
"In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clari ed. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the ctitious atmospheric green- house e ects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned di erence of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified." http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v4.pdf
In response to:

Marriage: A Supreme Test of Rights

RickeyB Wrote: Mar 05, 2013 1:56 PM
Diogenese, I agree completely with both your points, and they suggest a solution to the "gay marriage" problem. That would be to simply separate point 1 from point 2 by eliminating all references to marriage or married from all federal documents and forms, especially those in the IRS code, and replace them with (civil) partnership, civil union, or any non-religeous term everyone can agree upon. The details of such a law would have to be worked out by the Congress, of course, and the resulting law is unlikely to even faintly resemble any suggestions I might make here.
Everyone check this out - two German physicists have published a peer-reviewed paper which they say proves that CO2-caused global warming violates laws of physics: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v4.pdf
You are making outrageous assertions without offering any proof at all. Which is worse?
In response to:

Gun Industry Begins to Fight Back

RickeyB Wrote: Feb 20, 2013 12:01 PM
Now if only the ammunition manufacturers would follow suit. I'd like to hear that the company that got (or gets) the billion-round contract has backed out of it saying "sorry, we can't provide the ammunition you ordered. Our domestic sales are taking all we can produce." On tahe other hand, the Obama administration's policies and pronouncements have stimulated the firearms industry to an extent that no one could have imagined. It didn't require any bailouts and, in fact, didn't cost us one cent from the treasury.
I downloaded this paper a long time ago. It was published by two German physicists (PHDs) who have falsified the Global Warming theory based on known physics. Look for yourselves at: http://www.schmanck.de/0707.1161v4.pdf for a published, peer-reviewed paper.
Previous 11 - 20 Next