In response to:

Matthews: Jesus Preaches Mostly Compassion For Poor--Never About Hell

Rich D. Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 2:32 PM
Notice that the lying blasphemer has contributed nothing to the debate except when "littleoldme" gives underhanded compliments (man of good will, etc.) and then throws his stink bombs (Pope out, servant of the devil - never tired of that blasphemy that has him on his way to eternal destruction, loco.) He complains about ad hominems? He doesn't know what they are, which is why he is fit only to clean the boards in any theology class. Languages? Pure envy! I can get under the liar's skin by doing and saying nothing except what is relevant to the theme. Oh, we know he likes booze every day. That commends him. Poor lying blasphemer. No new bombs from him - just the same old skubala that non-catholics don't have valid pastors of faith.
dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 2:35 PM

Hi, Servant of Satan,

I don't lie and I don't blaspheme. Now on to more realistic and important matters.

Rich D. Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 3:06 PM

Sure - calling a Christian a servant of Satan is not blaspheming in your corrupt book, and saying you don't lie when you claim not to engage in personal attacks when they are visible to everybody is not lying, either. You are anathema by your own actions, not mine.

Back to your booze and dog.

Oh, you are not my opponent - it wouldn't be a fair exchange.
dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 4:35 PM

The servant of the devil must logically declare he is a Christian; above all. You can't be expected to declare yourself Satan's helper.

These are TELLS; clues to his actual resume, devil's servant.

1.) He must hate and therefore disparage at every opportunity, Christ's Holy MOTHER. She is ever-virgin; so the imp must deny that saying she was mother of other children; not only Jesus. Because he owns a Bible, he bowdlerizes texts about the "brethren of Our Lord."

2.) He must call Mary a sinner despite signs and texts where her sinless conception is obvious to men of good will. She gave birth to God's SON; a sinner would have been unable. PERIOD.

dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 4:46 PM

Ergo, he advances the horrid blasphemies against Jesus the Son of His holy mother; by passing on to the gullible ideas sent him by Satan. All lies; mainly that Jesus was born of a sinner; of the same domain as other sinners who give in to Satan's temptations. The mother of GOD!

A servant of the devil promotes only what the devil tells him to. Nothing HOLY, nothing true.

dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 4:51 PM

Which means basically; there's NO blasphemy in accusing a servant of Satan. He is helpless to see it for himself since the devil is a monstrous deceiver. I may be merciless, to accuse Rich D. But I tell him the truth.

Rich D. Wrote: Mar 16, 2013 1:05 AM
Anathema by your own words, not mine. You condemn yourself.
dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 16, 2013 12:29 PM

I take it you believe you've been blasphemed? Are you God?

I accuse you of being the devil's servant. Then I showed WHY you are. You can't deny anything, so I'm anathema! You're such a funny Christian, in so many vile ways, Pecksniff.

dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 7:18 PM

Rich D. is hot under the collar. Too bad; exposing his diabolical work for the devil is imperative.
[Imperative, Rich. From the Latin imperium.]

Keep squawking. It's true; you serve the devil. Naturally you hoped to appear a staunch believer with a command of Koine Greek and all that. It might have worked; but you were so filled with false pride. The phony in you alerted me to the devil who pulls your strings.

Rich D. Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 9:04 PM
dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 2:40 AM

Rich curses his opponent!

We have a new, real Pope!!!!
Rich D. Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 2:38 PM
We do know by his own admission that he was an abused kid - he might be living in his drunken Stockholm syndrome of sycophancy. That could explain it. We also know that his wife supports him - going to "the old grind" as he says while he and the dog sit around scratching whatever itches. Add it up.
Rich D. Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 2:49 PM
So when he gets his hans free from scratching, he will respond in many post with the same skubala instead of opening his mind and actually critiquing anything I wrote here. AL ask for verses - he got them. How does the lying blasphemer respond? Well, we're all thumpers for discussing the S cripture - hey - only the Pope can do that? If the lying blasphemer really thinks that, then why does he bother? Does he want to censor all of us? Can't he just go to another thread?

Noooo - his fat ego is fueled by envy and won't let him.

He can't stand to see anyone engaging in intellectual pursuits when he is still on his mental tricycle, captive in what he *erroneously* thinks is the pope's locked garage. Note the emphasis.
Rich D. Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 2:52 PM
Empathy and pity are losers anytime - sympathy and compassion are available to the humble. Justice is to the arrogant fools.
dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 7:27 PM

Poor chap. Rich is reduced to feeble-minded verbal abuse. Unlike what I've done; pointed OUT the way he serves the devil; on proof texts and reliable sources, he can't pin very much on me. Because he lacks debating skill.

What can I say? Sure, I was the victim of a pedophiliac relative. Innocent; but have I cried? NO; my faith has been stronger in Christ my Vindicator. He helped me to live 75 years; never saw a psychiatrist; never was traumatized, kept FAITH and still offer Jesus THANKS! Who calls me a sycophant?

A servant of the devil! Add it up! Rich needs an exorcist. A devil obsesses him.

dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 7:36 PM

Who says I'm a lying blasphemer?

A servant of Satan; who detests the mother of God. The devil always hated Mary; his servant hates her for emphasis. He isn't even embarrassed about it; he's an avowed opponent of Mariology, devotion to Christ's Holy mother! Rich TRIED, but couldn't make it stickL

I knocked down ALL the insults he shamelessly aimed at the Blessed Virgin Mary. He thinks I have to ENVY him? Envy him for failure to cut Mary off from biblically justified Christian devotion?

Rich D. Wrote: Mar 14, 2013 9:15 PM
dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 2:38 AM


Maybe this heroic saint feels he has authority to curse another believer in Christ; Do I have to worry?

dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 16, 2013 12:14 PM

That is what's known as lame English;

"By his own admission he was abused?

Aditting it?

I confided it; I had no fault to "admit," Stupe. Why don't you just write everything in Koine? At least you could conceal your lousy grammar! Lol!

dreadnaught/13 Wrote: Mar 16, 2013 12:47 PM

Sorry; "coceal your poor vocabulary," is what I mean.

This Imp is like the Scribes and Pharisees; who tell Jesus;

"It's your own admission you won't stone an adultress!"

I assume that the majority of those who listened to this statement of ignorance took Matthews at his word. Let me correct him: No other person in the entire Bible spoke of "fire and brimstone" (Hell) more than Jesus Christ himself.

As for the "smells and bells" pomp of the Catholic Church, Matthews is right when he asks, "What does this have to do with Jesus? What does this have to do with Christianity?"

Answer: Nothing.

One more thing Chris: What "separates" Christianity from all other faiths is not "compassion," it is that Christians believe our...