In response to:

Hoover’s Lessons

Richard1988 Wrote: Sep 06, 2012 1:35 PM
how would that have been worst than Stalin having it?
Joseph64 Wrote: Sep 06, 2012 7:48 PM
Let's also not forget that Germany had the first operational jet aircraft so they would have been able to build a bomber that flew high enough and fast enough to avoid the aircraft and air defenses of the nations he was fighting.
The Teleprompter Speaks Wrote: Sep 06, 2012 7:47 PM
We had the bomb for years before Stalin did. Stalin couldn't use it on us.

Presumably, had we not entered the war, we would not have built the bomb. The Manhattan Project didn't begin until after we entered the war.
Georgia Boy 61 Wrote: Sep 06, 2012 5:46 PM
For starters, Hitler would have the first operational ballistic missiles in the world - the V-2 and later the V-3 rockets - on which to load atomic warheads. That would have vastly upset the balance of power between the axis and allies, perhaps sufficiently to compell a negotiated agreement.
Illbay Wrote: Sep 06, 2012 5:25 PM
Hitler would have used it.

It was Herbert Hoover’s misfortune to be president when the stock market crashed in 1929. Three years later, Franklin Roosevelt would blame him for the Great Depression and defeat him at the ballot box. Historians ranking American presidents have placed Hoover near the bottom of their lists ever since.

If you’ve read Amity Shlaes’s masterful The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression, (and if you haven’t, do so without delay) you know there was more to Hoover’s economic thinking than is generally recognized. But for the last 20 years of his life, Hoover spent much of his...

Friday, May 24 | 09:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 09:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 09:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 09:30 PM ET