In response to:

Jailed for Nonpayment of Child Support - But it's Not His Child

RickG_Prov_RI Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 6:53 PM
So why isn't turnabout fair play? If a woman can exterminate a child because it's an inconvenient time in her life to be a mom why can't a guy say it's inconvenient for him to be a responsible father? Before everyone and their brother piles on accusing me of being amoral, yes I do believe men are responsible for their contribution to the well being of their offspring. I'm just looking at it from the perspective of 'freedom of choice' as it's written. Why is it a man can't state that he didn't intend to father a child therefore he is having his choices negated?
Joseph64 Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 7:02 PM
Following it a step further, why can't a man force a woman to have an abortion of a child that he does not want?
Brainstrained Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 8:38 PM
A wish made in- The Twilight Zone! Good Luck with that one! That crosses boundaries that most people don't want to debate! I guess the guys have NO control over a woman's body except to give them an o-r-g-a-s-m! Then, our job is done, get dressed and go stand in line in the Domestic Court building. The other one is-'keep it in your jeans-Kilroy! And remember,..No Viagra and beer.( No driving, either! Get It? )

The feminists have ratcheted up the laws against men to such an outrageous level that paternity fraud is not just ignored, but routinely rubber stamped by the courts. Whether one agrees with the concept of child support or not, virtually everyone can agree that jailing men for child support over children who are not theirs is morally wrong. Men are routinely sent to jail for falling behind on paying child support, even though debtors' prisons in the U.S. were mostly eliminated in the mid-nineteenth century.

The family courts and laws are set up in such a way that makes it very...