In response to:

Why Did Mitt Romney Lose?

Rich656 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 9:27 PM
cont'd I'm as conservative as one can be, but I follow the Buckley Rule: "vote for the most conservative candidate who can win". That was Romney. Oblabla won by what; 2, 2.5 million votes? U do the math. 3 million minus 2.5 million and Romney wins by a half million. A squeaker for sure, a win none the less. But 3 million conservative republicans sit out the election to prove a point. What point morons? Your point just sent us permanently down the road of Europeanization, and in 4 years years there will be no turning back. Oh Well, thank you to the 3 million for sitting home Tuesday with your thumbs up your collective @sses and giving the socialists exactly what they need to permanently change this country.
ccaammmm Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 9:34 PM
new york new jersey east coast votes were way down....sandy... who do u think they would vote for... use ur brain
Rich656 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 10:18 PM
used my brain stupid. do you read? do you have any reading comprehension skills, or are you a product of the public school system?
cancze Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 1:34 AM
Calm down boy, we feel for you. Now, take a deep breath and.........

Of course, virtually every American who follows politics closely will posit an explanation for why Mitt Romney came up short in 2012. But Sean Trende’s analysis over at Real Clear Politics seems to be the most insightful -- and plausible. Take a look at the following chart embedded in his must-read article:

Photobucket

Conventional wisdom tells us that Republicans lost because they failed to reach out to Hispanics, African-Americans and young people. And to a certain extent that is

Saturday, May 18 | 11:46 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 11:46 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 11:46 AM ET
Saturday, May 18 | 11:46 AM ET