In response to:

(Going) Forward

RHSimard Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 12:02 AM
You'd be a lot more credible if there weren't so many enormous differences between the two administrations. You aren't considering all the variables. A very large part of what remains is due to what the writer alludes to: Bush overspending and essentially doing many of the wrong things Obama is doing, but on a much smaller scale. Also, much of the Clinton era's success can be attributed to the healthy tug-of-war between Clinton's more progressive aspirations and the checkrein of an exceptionally effective Congress (remember the Contract with America? Newt Gingrich is a kind of sullied figure now, but he heroically marshalled support in Congress and that made for the best results.)

I’m not much of a whiner, nor am I someone who makes predictions. I’d hoped for a Romney victory, though more for an Obama defeat. But that, when you think about it, was the problem. While there’s no doubt Romney would’ve been a much better President than the current occupant of that office, when people are presented with a choice between the vague they know and a vague they don’t know, they will pick what they know.

Romney offered a vision of American that was different, but didn’t spend a lot of time explaining how it would get to...

Wednesday, May 22 | 09:40 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 09:40 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 09:40 PM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 09:40 PM ET