In response to:
You got it right in the last part of your statement. Their blind hatred for the second is just a festering sore on the surface of the big abscess that lies just under the surface.
As the gun control debate rages on, we’ve seen a host of gun-rights advocates standing up for the Second Amendment. In addition to citizens, the NRA, the National Sheriffs Association and countless others, a number of companies—including gun manufacturers, sporting good retailers and gunsmiths—are now taking a stand by refusing to sell to law enforcement in New York and other states with restrictive gun laws.
The message in these companies’ statements is essentially about equality—local law enforcement and government agencies should not have rights that citizens do not. Thus, if states such as New York choose to adopt restrictive...
It simply is not going to happen and they know it.
Disarming the public is, of course, the ulitmate wet dream of the Commie Progs, and absolutely essential for any tyranny to flourish.
Note how they always couch their arguments initially as gun "control", "regulation", and "registration", with the apparently reasonable goal of "public safety", "saving the children", and so forth.
In reality, they want to ban firearms and disarm the American citizenry.
They know they cannot plainly state this objective "up front', hence the dishonest approach.
The latter is a self-styled minority "genius" who has yet to win a single rhetorical argument with a Townhall member, and who is in reality an food-stamp recipient and a career failure.