In response to:

GOP Lawmakers: Tsarnaev is a “Good Candidate for Enemy Combatant Status”

RGR2424 Wrote: Apr 20, 2013 5:57 PM
YOu guys seem to support the constitution when it's about the second amendment. When it comes to judicial rights, not so much.
Curtis108 Wrote: Apr 20, 2013 6:17 PM
You seem to support the constitution when its about protecting criminals. The rest of the time, not so much.
psydoc Wrote: Apr 20, 2013 6:14 PM
Can you read, RGR. Many of us support the entire Constitution, including the part that guarantees this man a impartial trial.

So what’s next for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev? President Obama declared the Boston Marathon bombings an “act of terrorism” but seems keen on granting Tsarnaev a civilian criminal trial. Others, including Sens. Lindsey Graham and John McCain think he should be held as a potential enemy combatant, which would deny him a court-appointed attorney, among other rights, under the ‘law of war’. The case for the former, via Ken Klukowski:

 According to reports, Tsarnaev became a U.S. citizen in Sept. 2012. He was captured on U.S. soil by federal law enforcement officers (not military). This was not a battlefield setting,...