In response to:

Moore: Yeah, Obama “Didn’t Talk About Jobs” in his Second Inaugural

rgama Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 8:24 AM
Since it is not the Government's task to create jobs, that omission was appropriate.
conservative_one Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 10:02 AM
And GWB would have gotten the same pass------right?
Simplecaveman Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 9:03 AM
But he has destroyed jobs, particularly in the private sector, that omission needs to be pointed out.
Drew139 Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 5:48 PM




Your factoid is BS. Tell Rush you need accurate talking points. Any look at graphs from Bush's last year in office will show monthly job losses of 600-700,000 under that moron. Obama has turned that around, simpleton.
IvanKaramazov Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 8:52 AM
...unless a Republican is in office...
Duke Nuk'em Wrote: Jan 23, 2013 8:31 AM
Yet he sure is destroying a lot of them!

Many keen political observers have noticed the complete lack of a serious jobs plan, let alone an open and honest discussion about ways his administration can spur economic growth, in the president’s second inaugural address. In many respects, this comes as no surprise: the president ran a maliciously negative and unserious campaign that sought to destroy his political opponent at all costs. And it worked. But with another recession possibly on the horizon, shouldn’t this issue have been substantively addressed at some point during his somewhat lengthy remarks? The Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore addressed this question in a...