In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

RG_THP_Website Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 12:25 PM
Quit dodging the question. Who EXACTLY decides or determines when no one is harmed or when one is harmed?
InsightingTruth Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 12:30 PM
How about the individual being harmed? When that does not suffice the issue may be referred to a jury of the injured party's peers.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...