In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

RG_THP_Website Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 10:00 AM
The comparisons between Homosexuals and women's suffrage struggle, and african-american civil rights struggle, are not only ludicrous, but moronic at best. NO one can choose the color of the skin they will be born with or what gender or their ancestral heritage and ethnicity. EVERY Human can choose whom and what they will have sex with. The ability to reason and and make choices based in facts and logic is what separates men from animals. Those who contend that they have NO ability to choose whom or what they will have sex with, are in the same breath contending they are less than Human or sub-human.
Marie150 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 10:08 AM
But when all is said and done I now wonder if women are intelligent enough to vote. Voting to force people to pay for your abortions and calling anyone against that extreme. Not my idea of intelligence.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...