In response to:

Once a Critic of Deficits, Obama Now Goes for Broke

Ress Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:02 PM
Democrat logic is at least consistent and understandable: If we do it, it's good. If our opponents do it, it's very bad. Doesn't matter what it is.
clarityseeker2 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:12 PM
slight modification:

"If we do it, we are doing it for you and you will enjoy it. Should you challenge us on the issue, we will summarily demonize you. Got it?"
clarityseeker2 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:14 PM
"If our opponents don't do anything remotely akin to what we do, or would do, we'll sick the media, Hollywierd, and every wackjob within earshot of them. We'll declare unbridled corruption and commit ourselves to 'draining the swamp' of their ilk (and we're doing it for the general welfare of all of the little people)."
clarityseeker2 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:16 PM
"OH, JUST NEVER MIND, we're going to demonize you anyway. You deserve it and everyone listening to the mainstream media knows you do."
"You don't have to be a deficit hawk to be disturbed by the growing gap between revenues and expenses," said Sen. Barack Obama during a Nov. 3, 2005, debate on the Senate floor. At the time, Obama had been a senator for less than a year and the federal budget deficit was in fact shrinking, from $248 billion in fiscal 2006 to $160 billion in fiscal 2007. Still, Obama seemed deeply concerned about the deficit, and he appeared to believe it when he said the only way to close the shortfalls was to force Congress to pay for what it...