In response to:

Both Parties Agree: Sequestration Is Bad, but Better Than The Alternatives

Ress Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 4:01 PM
The headline of this article should read, "Both Parties Agree: We'll use this ridiculous dispute to fool the public into thinking we want to do something about controlling spending."
john4990 Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 4:10 PM
Absolutely correct. "Both Parties" are corrupt.
Lance8762 Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 4:05 PM
And then McCain: We should have an economic summit.

MORE flim flam.
Dregs_are_Commies Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 4:06 PM
McLame, but still better than the hussein!
Lance8762 Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 4:09 PM
That doesn't take too much, Dregs.
Sequestration Is the Worst Option Except for All the Other Options Both Democrats and Republicans have been roundly criticizing the security and economic effects of sequestration and, at the same time, taking very little action. The only logical conclusion is that both parties agree that sequestration is an awful, terrible, harmful set of policies - except the other proposed replacements are worse.

President Obama said "these cuts are not smart. They are not fair. They will hurt our economy." Speaker Boehner, writing in the Wall Street Journal, said "there's nothing wrong with cutting spending that much......

Related Tags: Barack Obama Sequestration