In response to:

Cop-Killer Supporter Marc Lamont Hill Gives Bogus Explanation for Pro-Dorner Comments

Resist, We Much!!! Wrote: Feb 15, 2013 2:54 PM
needs to be amended when it comes to the qualifications for being president. Right now, it says that a person has to be 35 years old and be a natural born citizen. WELL, THAT IS OBVIOUSLY UNFAIR BECAUSE THERE ARE A GREAT MANY OTHERWISE QUALIFIED PEOPLE WHO CANNOT RUN FOR PRESIDENT BECAUSE THEIR MOTHERS HAD TO HAVE A C-SECTION. BUT BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN A HUNDRED YEARS AGO, NOBODY EVEN THOUGHT OF THE DISCRIMINATION THAT WOULD RESULT FROM A DOCTOR HAVING TO DELIVER A BABY IN THIS UNNATURAL WAY. Now that we Democrats are in control of the government, that’s just one more thing we should change in our drive to make life fair. Please withhold my name because I don’t want to get crank calls. PROUD TO BE A DEMOCRAT

As Townhall reported Wednesday, Columbia University Professor and cop-killer supporter Marc Lamont Hill described ex-LAPD officer Christopher Dorner as "exciting," as a "modern day Django," and as "not totally crazy." After much criticism on Twitter, Hill doubled down on his comments and last night on the O'Reilly Factor, he justified his argument again.

Notice how Hill started his response by...