In response to:

The Republican Rape Dilemma

RepubRob2 Wrote: Oct 27, 2012 8:49 AM
Just playing Devil's Advocate for a moment, because I truly don't know what the solution is. But should the woman be forced to endure the the pain, the expense, the stigma, the inconvenience to her job and her mobility, and other issues, due to her misfortune of having been the object of a rapist's crime? Had the woman been shot by a bullet in her home rather than raped, we would not force her to retain the bullet in her body after the crime.

As Richard Mourdock’s Indiana Senate fate hinges on how voters absorb his views on rape, all conservatives have an opportunity for a look in the mirror.

Just how pro-life do we want to be?

The Mourdock controversy is nothing like Todd Akin’s self-inflicted wound in Missouri, the result of an embrace of just plain bad medical information.

Mourdock is in hot water for accurately (if not particularly skillfully) articulating what God instructs about the life of the unborn.

If he is on politically shaky ground, it is because he had the courage to stand on the...