In response to:

Why Republicans Are Poised To Lose The Second Amendment Battle

Repnextdoor Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 11:46 AM
Yes, although not stated, the SCOTUS will be happy to define limitations on the term: "arms." Does it include rocket launchers, small tactical nukes? Believe me, you do NOT want this SCOTUS to decide for you. You will be carrying Daisy air rifles! It is just that easy.
johnnytentpeg Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 5:20 PM
Doggoneit!

Your're right!

Only the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt gets ta have nice "arms" like F-16s and M1 Abrams tanks (200ea) courtesy of Uncle Sugar.

Who woulda thought?

Hey, gotta idea; maybe us "gun nuts" should just say we're in the Muslim Brotherhood and Feinstein will leave us alone!
MudontheTires Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 12:40 PM
Yes, although not stated, the SCOTUS will be happy to define limitations on the term: "arms."

They already have, you stupid Nazi.

You have to give progressives credit. They’re nothing if not thorough. When an opportunity to limit the Second Amendment presented itself in the Sandy Hook massacre, regardless how tasteless it was to exploit that opportunity, they went full bore toward their goal.

Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., introduced sweeping so-called “assault weapons” ban legislation this week that would place unprecedented restrictions on individuals’ rights to own, use, sell and even pass along already owned firearms to family members. But given where things stand now in the polls and political atmosphere, that legislation will go nowhere.

But the Constitution and the...