In response to:

The Need for Semi-Automatic "Assault" Weapons

Repnextdoor Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 4:40 PM
You are all hysterical and over-reacting. The government has our backs.
LouisianaMan225 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 8:40 PM
The guys are being mighty tough on your ironic remark. . .you were using irony, right?
Koz'isms Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 6:32 PM
Another government shill. You obviously also beleive Santa Claus pays for all of that protection, too. And that things should be free, right? All part of society. Ha! You are so pathetic...cant wait to get you out of my country.
rpm Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 6:24 PM
You always can count on government.
2ndAmendmentFollower Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 4:58 PM
Go ahead Rep if you have any guns turn em in and keep believing the government has your back.
sheepdogII Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 4:44 PM
We're not hysterical or over-reacting, were just applying something that you liberals wouldn't have a clue's called common sense.

By now, we’ve heard the argument about semi-automatic "assault" rifles: nobody needs one. We’ve heard the only reason why someone would obtain this kind of weapon is so they can kill people, which is far from the truth. We’ve also heard the argument from both the Left and the Right that a pistol is how someone protects their home.

"I really don’t know why people need assault weapons. I’m not a hunter but I understand people who want to hunt," Republican Rep. Peter King said on Morning Joe earlier this week. "I understand people who live in rough neighborhoods...