Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Martial Law and a Would Be King

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 26, 2014 4:06 PM
"Something tells me we will be subjected to Obama's tyranny until 2022." OK, I'll bite. What happens in 2022?
In response to:

Martial Law and a Would Be King

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 26, 2014 4:03 PM
The Secret Service, like all federal officers, takes an oath to protect us from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Whichever you believe Mr. Obama is, I expect that there are long-standing orders regarding any President who would become King. I just hope that whoever's on duty at the time, has the fortitude to carry out those orders.
Sure. It's 90% military, 10% theological. Theocracies, like Iran and ISIS, are highly vulnerable to charges of hypocracy / apostacy. A credible accusation of acting against their Holy Writ can be a devastating blow, if their legitimacy rests on their strict adherence to that Holy Writ. We should have a working group of non-Muslims, learned in Muslim scriptures and practices, preparing such accusations. Live by the Book, die by the Book.
You forget, the Islamic practice of taqiyya, or the "holy lie". It is permitted to deceive "infidels", if in doing so you promote Islam. While Obama may say that he is a Christian (really? What Christian church does he attend?), his actions have been to promote Islam across the globe. He's supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and various Islamist movements throughout the Middle East; yet when the more-secular people of Iran rebelled against their Islamic government he sided against them. He's provided early assistance to the "rebels" in Syria... who have been revealed as ISIS in Iraq; and he has given no tangible assistance to the Iraqi government except for 300 +/- observers who are not equipped for serious combat. No, if Obama were truly an "out" Muslim, his actions would be exactly the same as those he has taken; except for the claim that he's Christian. Like I said, taqiyya.
In response to:

UN: A Club in Need of Higher Standards

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 25, 2014 2:58 PM
Well, give Mayor DiBlasio a chance. Pretty soon NYC will once again be a third-world hellhole. Problem solved!
In response to:

UN: A Club in Need of Higher Standards

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 25, 2014 2:57 PM
No; if they had those they'd be (much more) dangerous.
In response to:

UN: A Club in Need of Higher Standards

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 25, 2014 2:56 PM
And re-acquire many valuable parking spaces; not to mention no longer having deadbeat tickets on the books.
In response to:

UN: A Club in Need of Higher Standards

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 25, 2014 2:54 PM
That's one law (the one against hacking) the Holder Department of "Justice" would vigorously enforce!
In response to:

UN: A Club in Need of Higher Standards

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 25, 2014 2:49 PM
Jonah, the idea of a "League of Democracies", whose member governments are democratic, and respect the Rule of Law and Individual Rights, is a good one. One question: Would the USA be allowed membership in such a League?
Wasn't it Lincoln who said, that the best way to get a bad law repealed, was to vigorously enforce it? So sure, if ObamaCare is going over the cliff - PUSH !
In response to:

Pitching Texas in Bookland

Reginald10 Wrote: Jul 25, 2014 2:20 PM
Sen. Cruz is needed in the Senate, to keep a Republican majority (assuming we ever get one). While 2014 looks favorable for the Republicans, the Senators who are up in 2016 look more like a favorable year for Democrats. I.e., in 2016 there are more Democrats in safe states, than Republicans; and more Republicans in UNsafe states than Democrats.
Previous 11 - 20 Next