In response to:

Analysis: Will Republicans Win the Senate?

ReedBlack Wrote: Sep 19, 2012 11:47 PM
Because democrats create jobs. Republicans create wars. 28 years of republican rule = 24 million jobs. 24 years under democrats = 42 million jobs. Clinton = surplus. No wars. Bush = horrible deficit = 2 wars. Bush senior = war. Reagan = wars. So, the score so far is republicans = less jobs, and war. Democrats = more jobs - no war. Also, lets not forget that most of the 47% live in red states. Damn... facts.
RayTheAnarchoCapitalist Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 9:25 PM
There was no Clinton surplus. There was a Clinton accounting trick where some debt wasn't counted as debt.

Leading up to the 2012 election cycle, many analysts predicted Republicans would seize a Senate majority with relative ease.  The math is heavily tilted in their favor:  Of the 33 seats up for grabs, 23 are controlled by Democrats.  The GOP needs to net four seats to guarantee control of Congress' upper chamber.  If Mitt Romney wins the presidency, a net of three seats would hand Republicans an effective majority, as Vice President Ryan would act as the tie-breaker.  But a few funny things happened on the way to 51 seats.  Safe incumbent Olympia Snowe of Maine decided to...

Related Tags: 2012 Senate
Wednesday, May 22 | 08:26 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 08:26 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 08:26 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 08:26 AM ET