1 - 10 Next
All too often green is worse for the planet than what it is replacing.
For as long as I remember Democrats hide their core values, because stating them looses votes.
In response to:

The Climate Con Goes On

Reed42 Wrote: Feb 21, 2015 12:36 PM
I personally am a climate skeptic. Any theory has the burden of proof placed on it, tested by its predictive accuracy. The Earth appears to be a full fledge denier. Equatorial heat belt (the basis of AGM) : not observed, average global temp rise: stalled, loss of Artic ice: not happening, rise of oceans : very slight, extream weather events: low, number of huracanes : down.
In response to:

The Climate Con Goes On

Reed42 Wrote: Feb 21, 2015 12:26 PM
Into a nice soft landing.
In response to:

"We Are Not At War With Islam," Obama Says

Reed42 Wrote: Feb 19, 2015 11:16 PM
Dear Doc, Based the the above comments you are too generous.
How do you fight an enemy you cannot identify?
In response to:

Damaging Admissions

Reed42 Wrote: Feb 17, 2015 12:14 PM
Dear Optimista, Most teachers are not socialist, the union leadership is a differnt animal.
In response to:

Damaging Admissions

Reed42 Wrote: Feb 17, 2015 11:49 AM
So the questions stands, where are Charter Schools allowed to use preferential treatment in choosing students? This seems to be one of the liberals biggest complaints, but I cannot find where it is true. If it does not exist, there is no need to complain about it. Kind of like complaining that the chupracabra ate my squatch.
In response to:

Damaging Admissions

Reed42 Wrote: Feb 17, 2015 11:05 AM
In Michigan Charter Schools have significantly more regulations to follow than traditional public schools.
In response to:

Damaging Admissions

Reed42 Wrote: Feb 17, 2015 11:03 AM
A few have thrown out the charge that Charter Schools can cherry pick students. Are there any examples where this is true? All the jurisdictions I am aware of there is no selection criteria allowed. I would like to know where and how cherry picking is allowed.
1 - 10 Next