In response to:

20 Observations About Human Nature That Liberals Would Probably Disagree With

Reed42 Wrote: Dec 01, 2012 6:23 PM
Sorry this is a very poor analogy. A better analogy is same base risk, but you voluntarily sign up to assist this other human of your own free will knowing ahead of time that if you choose to pull out after you volunteer to sign on the other human will be picked in toxic chemicals or torn limb from limb with no anesthesia or other recourse. Sorry for the run on.
Paul6310 Wrote: Dec 02, 2012 3:23 AM
But she can enforce her murderous will on a helpless infant and you will just stand there, approvingly. No wonder you use the moniker you do. And actually, that moniker would better be used by someone with a smidgeon of humor and wit at their disposal, not to mention an actual independent mind.
AZYaateeh Wrote: Dec 01, 2012 7:15 PM
If, as it seems, this is supposed to be an analogy for abortion, then sorry, but the huge difference is, abortion is not merely failing to preserve life, it is deliberately taking it. Suppose the person in your example, not wanting to undertake that ordeal, CHOSE TO KILL THE CHILD IN QUESTION.

Now quick. What's the ethical response?

1) Working hard, being self-reliant and taking responsibility for your own life are good for you and will make you much happier than having too much leisure time, being overly dependent and giving others responsibility for your life.

2) The more a behavior is rewarded with attention, fame, sympathy or money, the more of it we'll see. We recognize this almost instinctively when it comes to good behaviors, but we also tend to almost habitually block it out when it comes to behaviors we don't want to encourage.

3) There's nothing shameful about being poor -- but, if you stay...

Thursday, May 23 | 08:20 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 08:20 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 08:20 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 08:20 PM ET