In response to:

"There's a Sense That We Let Mitt Romney Down"

RedTruck Wrote: Nov 10, 2012 7:07 AM
Mitt Romney was perhaps the best qualified candidate to run for the Presidency in over a generation at least - his message - I am going to do what is best for this country - I intend to make this country run like a well oiled machine - and I have all the integrity and capability to do this. Response - our nation is loaded up with takers - yes takers - lazy people who can not stand to look at a moral, hard working man running the show - just like many, many of us can not stand to look at Obama an incompetent spew his divisive lectures every day. And Joe Biden - really America - Joe Biden VP - a senile old man who has sucked off the taxpayer his entire adult life.
Networker Wrote: Nov 10, 2012 7:23 AM
The only takers are the red states. They take in way more money in federal tax dollars than they pay in taxes. The blue statues fund the red states. So who are the takers?

http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/docs/ftsbs-timeseries-20071016-.pdf
Major Kid, USMC Wrote: Nov 10, 2012 7:32 AM
Sorry IDIOT, but you're insanely wrong. "The blue states fund the red states."??? REALLY??? HOW can they do that when the Federal government is consistently giving the blue states money to hand out to the leeches that live in the blue states.
Networker Wrote: Nov 10, 2012 7:36 AM
Facts are facts. try read the study instead of calling names. I know you guys hate math and think science is witchcraft, as the polling controversy proved, but this is reality and the facts prove it. The blue states pay more in taxes then they get back. The red states pay less and get more. The federal government transfers the money from the blue states. Reality sucks, doesn't it.
Jefferson's Ghost Wrote: Nov 10, 2012 7:15 AM
If you want to compare 2 different Americas, read about the Cat 4 or 5 hurricane that hit Galveston in 1900, and Hurricane Katrina that hit New Orleans in 2005. How the people reacted to these two events demonstrates very well how the nation has changed.
rendir Wrote: Nov 10, 2012 7:19 AM
I supported Romney in 2012,

Now that M-R has unbelievably lost to a very-vulnerable-trending-unpopular-Corrupt-Criminal-Deviant-Collosal-Lying-Crony-$$-handout-Politician-Pres:

"Romney would've been a "Great Pres"

But he was a "Very Weak Candidate," his constant stuttering was unbearable !

He should've been fully prepared for the 2nd debates BHO-Libya-gate-topics-?'s-answers, reviewed Obama's Rose-Garden-speech !

We could've won-big with someone strong on Big-Govt-$pending-cuts-dpt-agncy-downsizing,

pro-US-enrgy-ind, proper-use-of-military-w/less-unnecessary-unneeded-overseas-intervention, more-homeland-security-defense,

less-Big-Govt-against-the-USC-citizens-privt-rights, Rand Paul, Mike Pence, Scott Walker, John Kasich, Mike Lee !

Mitt Romney's top campaign aides conducted a conference call with conservative journalists this afternoon, during which they assessed the damage from Tuesday's electoral loss.  The participants included campaign manager Matt Rhoades, political director Rich Beeson, polling director Neil Newhouse and digital director Zac Moffatt.  A few notes from the call:

Matt Rhoades, on the overall race: "No campaign is perfect, and we certainly made our share of mistakes." On Paul Ryan: "He has come away from this race with a very bright future before him."

Rich Beeson, on the campaign's strategy: "We won independents and held the base....