Previous 11 - 20 Next
Eric Holder needs to go first. I was never really comfortable with impeachment of Bill Clinton. Presidents generally shouldn't be impeached for being stupid. In the case of Obama, he should be impeached for the same reasons that Nixon was impeached: abuse of power. Once a president assumes powers unto himself, what recourse is left besides impeachment?
Vouchers, and more parental authority over what children are exposed to at school, wouldn't hurt either.
"Kathleen Sebelius again affirmed that the administration will be ready for its November 30th deadline." It depends upon what you mean by 'ready', of course.
In response to:

The Problem With Libertarians

RedState08 Wrote: Nov 07, 2013 3:45 AM
I love to hear liberals complain about the Tea Party. Actually, I love to hear liberals complain. It means that there is some threat to their world view that is potent enough for them to wake out of their self indulgence and pay attention. Haven't heard many liberal complaints about RINO's lately.
Libertarian is ok for primaries. That's the Tea Party approach is through the candidates. Third party candidates in the actual election are suicidal for the state, unless you actually Prefer McAuliffe to Cuccielli. And don't tell me that you don't agree with either of the and therefore it's ok to post a 3rd candidate in the election. Te 3rd party always draws votes from the party that is is most similar too. Ralph Nader screwed over the Democrats, and Ross Perot screwed over the Republicans. Consider this. It was Democrat backers who paid for the canvasing that enabled Robert Sarvis to be on the ballot. Think long and hard about why they would do that. If you want to be in the Super Bowl, you need to win the playoffs first. If you can't win the playoffs, you have no business being on the field during the final showdown. But yeah, next time the RNC calls for a contribution, I'll send mine directly to the candidate..
Next time RNC calls, I'll send my contribution directly to the candidate.
"But Rush is right. The big loser in all of this? Ken Cuccinelli. He would have been a good governor, too." Actually the big loser in all this is the people of Virginia. And considering the national attention and funding that poured into the McAuliffe campaign, the entire US will suffer for the Cuccinelli loss. Yes, next time the party calls, I'll send my contribution directly to the candidate.
In response to:

Poll: McAuliffe: 50%, Cuccinelli: 33%

RedState08 Wrote: Oct 24, 2013 11:59 AM
Sad, but apparently true.
In response to:

Poll: McAuliffe: 50%, Cuccinelli: 33%

RedState08 Wrote: Oct 24, 2013 11:58 AM
Third party candidates only harm the leading candidate that is most like themselves in terms of policies and political views. The place for 3rd party politics is in the primaries leading up to the election. There's the Super Bowl, and then there are the playoffs. Unless the winning candidate has a clear majority rather than merely a plurality, the charge will always be that the 3rd party candidate threw the election over to the opposition.
In response to:

Poll: McAuliffe: 50%, Cuccinelli: 33%

RedState08 Wrote: Oct 24, 2013 11:30 AM
The one way that I judge the effectiveness of opposition to the destruction of the founding principles of this great country in decline is by the amount of vitriol generated by those intent on bringing it down. The Tea Party must be doing SOMETHING right in order to raise such an outcry. It has become music to my ears an is an indication that they are more effective than the establishment Republicans.
In response to:

Higher Education?

RedState08 Wrote: Jul 15, 2013 4:10 PM
That is so true. What this administration really need is a non-story to blanket the media, as a distraction from real issues in this country and it's current office holders.
Previous 11 - 20 Next