In response to:

Rand Paul and the Rest of You Damn Conservatives Need to Get Off John McCain's Lawn!

RedRum Wrote: Mar 09, 2013 10:40 AM
Even in the face of Obama's expansion of government spending and authority over our everyday lives, John McCain is still willing to give him the benefit-of-the-doubt with regard to drone use on US soil against American citizens. This undue deference is one of the reasons Obama walked all over McCain in 2008. Unfortunately, Mitt Romney didn't learn a thing and repeated the same mistakes last year. That approach does NOT work! Obama is aggressively expanding the power, scope and reach of federal power. It is not wrong for those believing in smaller government to ask serious questions about these policies. John McCain can play his passive-aggressive approach with Obama, but it hasn't worked. Rand only wanted answers!
Reginald10 Wrote: Mar 09, 2013 2:18 PM
"Benefit of the doubt"? There is no doubt. These circumstances are explicitly described in the Fifth Amendment, and the government is PROHIBITED from punishing anyone under these circumstances.

There is no doubt - unless you disregard the Fifth Amendment.

I asked the president, can you kill an American on American soil, it should have been an easy answer. It’s an easy question. It should have been a resounding, an unequivocal, “No.” The president’s response? He hasn’t killed anyone yet. -- Rand Paul

I do not believe that question deserves an answer. -- Lindsey Graham

Mr. Holder’s letter answers Mr. Rand’s question, “Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill Americans not engaged in combat on U.S. soil. The answer to that question is 'no.’”--