In response to:

Libertarians' Awkward Bedfellows

redneck8 Wrote: Feb 27, 2013 11:29 AM
Government needs to stay out of the bedrooms of consenting adults? That's great, but marriage is not about the bedroom. The military is already beginning to discover this. On base housing, do married couples lose housing to a gay couple? How do they know if they are actually gay or just a couple of guys wanting on base housing. Medical care, if they provide care for "partners" why shouldn't they provide care for heterosexual partners? The list goes on and on. Unintended consequences....libertarians need to think of this before falling for the "bedroom "argument.
NavVette Wrote: Feb 27, 2013 11:43 AM
You've missed the point. They want the government out of the business of defining marriage, period. This latest iteration of "committed relationship" without marriage and getting housing and medical benefits for the non-military "committer" (?) is absurd. Let them get married first, just the way straight people have to. I am a Libertarian and I have thought of exactly this. I'm not crazy about gay marriage in the military, and these points you made are only the tip of the iceberg. There's more issues to come for the gay military members.

Last week, Conservative pundit Ann Coulter told me and a thousand young libertarians that we libertarians are puss- -- well, she used slang for a female body part.

We were in Washington, D.C., at the Students for Liberty conference, taping my TV show, and she didn't like my questions about her opposition to gay marriage and drug legalization.

"We're living in a country that is 70 percent socialist," she says. "The government takes 60 percent of your money. They take care of your health care, your pensions ... who you can hire ... and you (libertarians) want to suck up to...