1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 11:28 PM
By the early 60's we had a recession and Kennedy advocating lower rates. The high rates persisted and the 70's were worse. I remember Jimmy Carter. Then Reagan slashed the rates which jumped started growth and increased revenues. Clinton with the help of the GOP did not raise taxes and signed welfare reform allowing growth to continue. Now liberals are agitating to take even more from the earners and distribute it to others. That is both greedy and immoral especially in light of all the evidence.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 10:11 PM
"The final and best means of strengthening demand among consumers and business is to reduce the burden on private income and the deterrents to private initiative which are imposed by our present tax system — and this administration pledged itself last summer to an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in personal and corporate income taxes to be enacted and become effective in 1963." JFK Adrress to Economic Club of NY 12/14/62 Kennedy whinnig less than 10 years after Korea.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 9:54 PM
Guess you didn't know the Revolutionary War was instigated by immoral tyranical taxes. More about tax cuts than increases. I cited JFK for lower rates what is your source? Or is it just about getting even for some injustice you have deluded yourself into believing?
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 9:32 PM
Don't forget government greed. Politicians who demand more and more of working Americans to finance their pet projects. It is immoral for the government to have its hand in any man or woman's pocket rich or poor while they are working.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 9:01 PM
If that made sense to me I would be a brain dead liberal but unfortunately that is the reality of what is occurring when the lower to zero brackets vote to raise the rates of the rest.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 8:46 PM
Taxing one group of citizens at a lower rate than another group is favoring one group at the expense of the other.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 8:39 PM
And the 80% can vote themselves the property of the minority 20%.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 8:28 PM
"The final and best means of strengthening demand among consumers and business is to reduce the burden on private income and the deterrents to private initiative which are imposed by our present tax system — and this administration pledged itself last summer to an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in personal and corporate income taxes to be enacted and become effective in 1963." JFK Adrress to Economic Club of NY 12/14/62 This quote use to drive Ted nut.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 8:21 PM
Because favoring one group over another and calling it fairness is the definition of hypocrisy.
In response to:

The Invincible Lie: Part II

redglare Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 8:20 PM
Because favoring one group over another and calling it fairness is the definition of hypocrisy.
1 - 10 Next