In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

ReddestNeck Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 9:53 AM
And that's PRIVATE nudity. Not public....
Barbara1247 Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 5:09 PM
Those most likely to be offended are those least likely to be watching the "pride" parade.
Jay Wye Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 5:29 PM
the nudity in a homo "pride" parade is to INTENTIONALLY OFFEND others,along with advertising their homosexuality.
DCM in FL Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 9:59 AM
Besides which, there's just something inherently different between basic nudism and, say, public nudity in a gay-rights parade.
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity