In response to:

Why Not Treat SCOTUS Opinions Like They Treat the Constitution?

rebelready Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 10:43 AM
Our US court system is set up as a huge racketeering enterprise for corporate & attorney profit, & quid pro quo benefits for court staff. The Supreme Court is just as corrupt as the lower courts & has no intention of engaging its supervisory powers over the corrupt lower courts; the Administrative Offices of the US Courts are set up to cover and promote the corruption. The oversight committees have ignored the American people who have been telling them for over a period of years that without fear of consequence the third branch has been aiding and abetting, not only civil rights violations, but crimes against the American people. We are being ruled by 3 Branches of alleged criminals!

What if we all simply decided to interpret the 5-4 Supreme Court decision to uphold Obamacare as a 9-0 vote to overturn Obamacare?

“Well, that wouldn’t be right!” you say. “That wouldn’t respect the rule of law. People can’t just interpret laws anyway they want.”

Why not? That’s exactly what Chief Justice Roberts and the four liberals justices did in the Obamacare case. They either changed the meaning of Obamacare (Roberts) or changed the meaning of the Constitution (Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan) to pretend that there is no conflict between Obamacare and the Constitution.

I have a couple of questions: 1)...