We don't need no phuckin 5th amendment! Shoot the bas tard without any trial of any kind. Yep, it's amazing how many "conservatives" are willing to disregard the Constitution when it suits our needs. You are forbidden from EVER posting anything derogatory about a liberal who wants to "redefine" the Constitution.

Dude, after having seen multiple posts by you all stating, in essence, the same thing I have to say...you're either a blatant ideologue or intellectually stunted. Let me be as clear as possible (as many others have tried to be in response to your posts): There is not now, nor has their ever been any claim that the LAW is giving this issue a pass. Everyone KNOWS that the justice system is doing what they're supposed to do. The claim is, and always HAS been, that the media is giving as little attention to this as is possible. Notice I did not say "none" I said as little as possible. That's simply a fact. Why? There are some theories, but Mr. LaMont pretty much sums it up. Now, is it possible for you to attempt to see past your own bias?

So, what you're saying is that a zygote/tissue mass/fetus/baby is simply a burglar, then? Ok, then, let's go with that and we can bring charges on the CHILD post-birth. Would that be 1st or 2nd degree breaking and entering? Just curious.

You're a real class act. Speaking as a conservative, I can only say that I pity your hatred for your fellow countrymen, that drives you so much that al you can think of, in this time, is to come onto TH and incite. The only thing I am disappointed in is that my fellow "countrymen" (e.g. - those like you) consider me such an evil being that even in this time you cannot put aside your silliness. I pray that you can reconcile with whichever "conservative": has so wounded you.

It's exactly that mindset that is the problem in our society. As long as we only expect our representatives to be better than the other guys, that's all we'll get. Why can't we simply look at his approval ratings on their own merits as a reflection of how well he's doing HIS job? But hey....as long as he's doing better than those damned Republicans we can guarantee to keep Democrats in power. After all, that's REALLY what's most important, right?

The ironic / hypocritical part that no one ever wants to admit to is this....... "We hold these truths to be self evident, that ALL men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." Unless they are our enemy, in which case that Creator has granted us with superior "rights". Is there ever a time, where our "right" to life is not MORE important than someone else's right?

Let's be clear, I am not saying that a pre-emptive strike is not warranted. I'm not even suggesting that the answer might not BE a tactical nuke, but am just asking that we recognize the fact that we are not simply talking about a bullet through his head. We're talking about several hundred/thousands bullets through heads. I just want us to be freakin honest about what we're suggesting and not minimize the scope. The assumption that "they are his collaborators and enablers" is like saying that everyone in D.C. within a 2 mile radius of the White House is an acceptable loss, because.....

"But I think a tactical nuke on Kim Young 'un at home would be most effective. One shot, one kill, who's next? " The problem with that is it isn't just one kill we're talking about. Even a tactical nuke in Pyongyang, would take out hundreds, maybe a small thousands of people. In our bloodlust, let's just be honest, ok?

I am absolutely ashamed of this country's "leaders"....almost every single one of them. And none to proud of about 47% of the sheople. Be prepared, folks, because this is NOT going to go well. And it's going to go haywire, not just in our life times, but in 2013 I suspect.

We're going to lose this....and several others, as well....argument. Simple as that. What SHOULD be happening is of no consequence, because the people that can enforce it are the very ones perpetrating the acts. We have no one, in D.C., that is truly willing to stand up to the progressive machine. Because standing up, MAY require something more than words. We have no one who has the stones to say "give me xxxxxx or give me death". There will be no border enforcement. There simply will not be, as pathetic as that is, because we have no one who is willing to stand up to the dictators and say "over my dead body. So, bring a gun when you vote." We will also see gay marriage "legalized by June; The "debt ceiling" raised again my $.02